Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8)
  with HTTP id 2901261 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:59:07 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: overhead approach
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:59:07 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2901261@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <002101c3c8ab$c03fb7f0$4ab0040a@C1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Bill Hogarty <billhogarty@direcway.com>:

For Andres Katz:

Would sure love to get a copy of your letter from the FAA blessing the
overhead approach.  Is this possible?
Regards, Bill Hogarty

[ I'm confused, all tower guys know what an overhead appr is... its in
their handbook http://www1.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap5/aim0504.html#5-4-24
I guess for non towered fields you can explain it much like you
do on practice IFR approaches so those VFR students know what to expect.

heck, my favorite is, "Tiger flight of 8, 1 mile initial, sr-22
on crosswind, don't worry, we will all be down before you make 
midfield downwind.. http://rob.com/pra/ckb/P4130025.jpg  -Gator ]