Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.167.37] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.5)
  with HTTP id 2625935 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 10:21:34 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Prop on the Super ES
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.5
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 10:21:34 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2625935@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <200310061422.h96EMImG006762@webforce.computan.on.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for <keighan@computan.com>:

Kirk what kind of performance differences were there between the TIO-550 and 
the IO-550.  The Turbo a/c would be about 100lbs heavier.  
Thanks
Scott

Kirk Hammersmith <kirk@direct2avionics.com> said:

>>>I initially planned for a TSIO-550 in my ES, but 
have since decided on an IO-550 w/ some treatment from Lycon.  I've flown an 
ES w/ the TSIO up front and all the "stuff" in back - it was a wonderful 
flyer.  Ed Rosiak in CA has this setup.  The TSIO-550 install had a 4-blade 
MT on it.  I've also flown some hours on an ES w/ an IO-550 and Hartzell on 
the front.  It felt nose heavier than Lancair's ES (MT on the front) but not 
a huge difference. <<<