Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:44:14 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [66.126.157.183] (HELO D2A) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with SMTP id 2623951 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 09:55:47 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <000601c38a8f$f8883ba0$0f02a8c0@D2A> From: "Kirk Hammersmith" X-Original-To: Subject: JPI EDM900 X-Original-Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 08:55:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C38A55.4BD3C990" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 Disposition-Notification-To: "Kirk Hammersmith" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C38A55.4BD3C990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>Art wrote: What I am trying to determine is did JPI add any features to the engine monitoring portion of the box that would give the 900 a major improvement over the 800 besides the large screen display. My experience with the EDM 900 has for the most part been negative. = I've flown aproximately 60-70 hrs with the EDM 900 and even after being = replaced several times by JPI, continues to have glitchy problems. It = is also difficult to use. To be fair, I've talked with two pilots that = are not having problems with it, but they too think it is not very = intuitive to use. I would consider Vision, EI or Grand Rapids or Chelton before JPI. Kirk Hammersmith=20 Direct-To Avionics=20 (541) 504-8300 ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C38A55.4BD3C990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>Art wrote: What I am trying to = determine=20 is did JPI add any features
to the engine monitoring portion of the = box that=20 would
give the 900 a major improvement over the 800 besides
the = large=20 screen display.
 
My experience with the EDM 900 has for the most part been = negative. =20 I've flown aproximately 60-70 hrs with the EDM 900 and even after being = replaced=20 several times by JPI, continues to have glitchy problems.  It is = also=20 difficult to use.  To be fair, I've talked with two pilots that are = not=20 having problems with it, but they too think it is not very intuitive to=20 use.
 
I would consider Vision, EI or Grand Rapids or Chelton before=20 JPI.
 
Kirk Hammersmith
Direct-To Avionics
(541) 504-8300=20
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C38A55.4BD3C990--