Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:51:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from lakemtao01.cox.net ([68.1.17.244] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2623294 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:32:59 -0400 Received: from Dan.cox.net ([68.98.134.125]) by lakemtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031003223259.NVHH7826.lakemtao01.cox.net@Dan.cox.net> for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:32:59 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20031003182830.00b2cc30@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: danobrien@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 X-Original-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:32:59 -0400 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net From: Dan O'Brien Subject: Prop for the Super ES Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I'm about to order a 3-bladed prop for my Super ES. Since the Super ES tends to be nose heavy, I've narrowed my decision to either an MT or Aerocomposities prop. Does anyone who has either prop have any regrets? Thanks, Dan O'Brien Lancair N624LD reserved