Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 20:40:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net ([64.255.237.173] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2621655 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:23:50 -0400 Received: from artlt (dsl-133-78.tstonramp.com [206.55.133.78]) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 79BF26D776 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:23:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <003a01c38911$ae696d20$4400000a@tstonramp.com> From: "Art/Sue Bertolina" X-Original-To: "Lancair list Lancair list" Subject: EDM-900 X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:19:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Hi Lee Thanks for your response and input on the 700 vs. 800. What I am trying to determine is did JPI add any features to the engine monitoring portion of the box that would give the 900 a major improvement over the 800 besides the large screen display. I could not make that determination from their web-site and am not sure just the display is worth the added cost. Regards Art