Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:09:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.185] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2621478 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:10:49 -0400 Received: from a ([67.69.55.214]) by tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.04 201-253-122-130-104-20030726) with SMTP id <20031002161047.FKRQ28086.tomts23-srv.bellnexxia.net@a> for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:10:47 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <008d01c38901$3f087f80$d6374543@a> From: "Ian B. Crowe" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Oil cooling still a problem X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:21:33 -0400 Organization: Corvi Trade Consultants Inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 I have a 360 with a 200 HP engine. My oil cooler is a 13 row cooler and my baffling is as tight as the part of a duck that is usually described as watertight. I have plenty of exit area at the rear of the cowling, but as my cowl is not stock and the fuel injection unit is forward facing from the side of the pan, there is no need for a "trough" in the cowl. The rear of the cowling is therefore level with the bottom of the firewall. I did all the housekeeping items, gauge check, vernitherm check, verification of all baffling and manufacture of a proper plenum chamber on the cooler before I embarked on the following pilgrimage. I started off with the cooler on the firewall fed through a 3" scat hose from a NACA duct on the RH side of the lower cowling. Oil was too hot. I opened a 3" hole in the RH rear baffle and fed the cooler from there. Not sufficient improvement! So I made a large Y and fed the cooler from both the NACA duct and the rear baffle. Here I think one source fought the other and the oil was still too hot. Next step was to put vents in the bottom of the bottom cowling as per a recommendation in the Lancair newsletter. Better but not good enough. I removed the Y and increased the exit from the NACA duct to 4", still not satisfactory. So I fitted vortex generators as per the recommendation of another list member. Much better but still would not provide consistent cooling for multiple touch and go. At this point I gave up on the NACA duct and blanked it off. I increased the size of the cowling air intake by 50% and built ramps inside the cowling top to smooth the air entering the cowling and prevent turbulence. The cooler went on the rear RH baffle. Bingo! My only problem now will be to build restricter plugs for the winter to keep the engine and oil warm enough. I do not know neither do I care particularly or even notice what this has done to my drag and/or speed. I can point the nose skyward on the hottest day and climb, climb climb without worrying about the temperatures. Engines are too expensive to mistreat. They are also fundamental to your health. If you go to the RV web site there is information available on the best way to get good cooling. I believe the smoothing of the turbulent entry flow is a big factor in getting air through the engine and cooler. There are many ways of killing the proverbial pig, this worked for me. Ian Crowe C-FKRO 85 hours and counting