Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 23:52:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2620804 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:46:43 -0400 Received: from user.sc.rr.com (cae88-105-147.sc.rr.com [24.88.105.147]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h922iPW0005633 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:44:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031001224220.01b4fba8@pop-server.sc.rr.com> X-Sender: sreeves@pop-server.sc.rr.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 X-Original-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:46:38 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List From: Steve Reeves Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Oil Cooling STILL a problem In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > >I would start looking a gaps in my baffling if the oil cooler that you have >has been used by others successfully. >Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh There aren't any gaps in the baffling. I don't believe that it was used in a manner that I would deem successful. I think the previous owner may have been satisfied with that, but I definitely am not. I purchased the plane during the fall season (it was cool) and the plane runs fine in the winter. I'm sure this had something to do with the timing of the sale as well. If you "manage" the climbout (a really shallow one) you can get it to do so-so. I want something that really performs and not something I need to nurse. Thanks for your input. Steve