Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.5)
  with HTTP id 2620406 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:52:19 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: EDM-900
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.5
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:52:19 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2620406@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a701c3885a$9af09c80$4400000a@tstonramp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Art/Sue Bertolina" <artbertolina@earthlink.net>:

I'm trying to determine the difference between the EDM-800 and the 900. Does
the 900 add enough to your panel
to justify the added cost ?. It will be monitoring a TSIO 520BE that has
been built to TSIO 550 with hi-compression pistons and reworked turbo's. I
intend to
run the engine Lean of Peak at cruise. If anyone out there
knows these instruments I would appreciate your input
Art Bertolina

[ the 900 has MAP and estimated %hp displayed -Rob ]