Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.34] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2605564 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:32:26 -0400 Received: from b8p5r1 (slip-12-64-204-11.mis.prserv.net[12.64.204.11]) by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP id <2003092700322420402qt6fae>; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:32:24 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Gain a couple of knots X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:38:33 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000901c3848f$b26d4080$0bcc400c@b8p5r1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Jerry, >I hate to argue, but think that you are using a common fallacy about >CG effects. Not all. Appreciate the bucket of insight. Will read again to try to comprehend it all. However, did you mean this? >The trim drag from your elevator being slightly nose up is a >function of the up load (actually reduced down load) required to achieve balanced flight. This discussion and my premise is based on my elevator actually being slightly nose Down - not up. It is the counterweight that I was referring to as slightly nose up. Larry Come see us in Pecan this sat am.