Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #20702
From: D&BWILLS <dwills@glbelt.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Aerobatics
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:50:21 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
  the +9g and -6g loading is for the wing only. I suspect the rest of the of the plane could fall apart much sooner (320/360) it is also subjected to high G-loads. I would keep within +3.5 to -1 myself for a good built 360. I've seen stress cracks under the belly where the inner gear door cutouts meet the belly. This is slightly inboard of the wing root, from 360's that I was told were rolled. I can't imagine the load on engine mounts when you compile the high G-loads with gyroscopic loads of the power plant ( you may have a sudden C/G change, and become a whole lot lighter ). I know there are people doing this, but I want the margin of structural failure on my side.
As far as bailing out, good luck getting the canopy open unless your stopped in mid air. I'm trying to figure a spring loaded front hinge release, with a T-stop that doubles as a latch at the rear of the canopy so the canopy will flip up from the front like a lid and not slide back into my face.
When I did the air combat thing they had an exit procedure to minimize the risk of hitting the tail section on exit. I think this would be a good idea with my plane if I can ever get the darn thing built.
 
as for the gyros getting trashed, get some RC Allan's without stops, or spend more and get a caged gyro.
 
Dale Wills
360 Builder
 
The RV, however is rated for
aerobatics...the Lancair is not.


I beg to differ.  The Lancair 320/360 has an ultimate stress loading of +9g and -6g.  The manual gives entry speed recomendations for various aerobatic manuevers.

Rick Argente
N360ZR

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster