Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.164.27] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.4) with HTTP id 2603326 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:20:54 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Gain a couple of knots To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.4 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <004801c38362$e9b039e0$69331c0c@s0026980490> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Ron and Marlene Brice" : Scott, Now that you mention it, I forgot to mention the slight difference between my Legacy and the factory Legacy (199L) in my recent post about tail fuel in the MD-11 and it's effect on cruise. With my rearward C.G. compared to 199L, I noticed that 199L had slightly better dynamic stability in both pitch and roll axis's (HHMMM, did I spell that right?) than mine. Nothing unsafe, as I was still well within design C.G. limits, but this was additional motivation to move the C.G. more forward. For what it's worth, Ron >>>I'll race you anytime - if you survive. The rear CG condition leads to neutral (or worse, divergent) pitch stability, hard to keep on top of the beach ball. <<<