Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:23:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2601894 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:44:04 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.1ef.1047658a (4238) for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:43:02 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ef.1047658a.2ca331a5@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:43:01 EDT Subject: Limit Load vs Ultimate Load X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 Ric, Ric, Ric -- Please be careful! The Lancair 360 does, in fact, have a 9G *ultimate* load. That means when you hit 9.1 G the airplane is supposed to break into little tiny pieces. What we should be careful not to exceed is the *limit* load. This is the load above which the airplane will bend rather than break. For an aluminum airplane a safety factor of 1.5 is typical. This would give the 360 a limit load factor of 6G for an ultimate load factor of 9G. However, composite structures don't fail as gradually as aluminum so we usually use a safety factor of 2.0, which would result in a limit load rating of 4.5G. More like a utility category airplane. Myself, I intend to install a 2 inch G meter with a redline of 4.5G, and do the occasional loop and roll. (After receiving instruction from my builder buddy who is a CFI and has done competition aerobatics and instruction thereof.) - Rob Wolf