Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.84.140] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b3) with HTTP id 2132967 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:24:50 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Looking for Aero Composites To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b3 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:24:50 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3E9F72DD.1030308@lvcm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for rickschrameck : John, I have flown the Aero Composite against the Two bladed Hartzell with great results. I have not tested it against the new Hartzell Three bladed scimitar prop. I have a special race prop from Hartzell that may look similar but the look is the only thing that is similar. Mine is a full feathering , one of only Three race props made for Reno racing only. I do believe that the new Hartzell and the Aero Composite are great props and if weight is not an issue use the Hartzell. If weight is the issue use the Aero Composite. You will love either Three bladed prop. I would not use the Two blade prop for my application ( Supercharged) Regards, Rick >Having flown with both, could you give us your impressions of the Aero >Composite prop vs. the new Hartzell scimitar 3-blade prop you installed on >your Legacy. It's a valid question --- is the Aero Composite prop $4000 >better than the 3-blade Hartzell?