Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:26:14 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b3) with ESMTP id 2132147 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:22:57 -0400 Received: from JPKleber@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.174.1995e1b9 (3956) for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:22:53 -0400 (EDT) From: JPKleber@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <174.1995e1b9.2bcff69d@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:22:53 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Looking for Aero Composites X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10637 To Rick Schrameck: Having flown with both, could you give us your impressions of the Aero Composite prop vs. the new Hartzell scimitar 3-blade prop you installed on your Legacy. It's a valid question --- is the Aero Composite prop $4000 better than the 3-blade Hartzell? Thanks, John Kleber