Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:33:59 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailhost.det3.ameritech.net ([206.141.193.106] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1998151 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:06:15 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.201] ([66.72.186.205]) by mailhost.det3.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with ESMTP id <20030125190607.CRSS15422.mailhost.det3.ameritech.net@[10.0.1.201]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:06:07 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: lorn@pop.dynacomm.ws X-Original-Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3E30592D.D43CABBC@Philips.com> References: <3E30592D.D43CABBC@Philips.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:06:14 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net From: "Lorn H. Olsen" Subject: [LML] Re: IFR instrumentation X-Original-Cc: Rob Logan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > > FAR 91.205 spells out the instrumentation needed for IFR. >> Does it require approved, or tso'ed, or other federally blessed > > instruments, or metal rather than glass instruments? My radio shop would not do the 24 month check on my altimeter because it wasn't on there list of certifiable altimeters. So... I think that you should ask whoever is going to do your 24 month checks. -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-478-4301, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan