Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:30:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1997077 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:27:31 -0500 Received: from sdn-ap-001watacop0131.dialsprint.net ([63.187.192.131] helo=f3g6s4) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18cBMI-0004gI-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:27:30 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <008f01c2c3ef$c005c980$83c0bb3f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Possible nose gear leg rod end X-Original-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:29:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Scott wrote: "...but I am bothered by the fine-thread pitch." I agree, Scott - fine threads in aluminum, where the force in tension had to be quite high (think botched cross-wind landing), gave me pause too. That's why I had my redesigned main gear lower o/c link parts made of steel (re: my earlier post) since the male threaded rod had to fit the rod-end bearing female threads - which are NF. Regarding the use of a Heli-coil insert in aluminum: If there's enough meat in the female threaded part, a Heli-coil could be installed but it's still be a fine thread since the Heli-coil insert, by design, has to have the same thread pitch as the male piece screwed into it. Don't see where this changes anything. The threads in the aluminum still must react the same loads, albeit through the Heli-coil rather than directly. In any case, whether I'm just overly cautious or not, I'll go with some over-design in an area where being wrong can have such bad results. Good flying, Dan Schaefer