Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.1]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 02:47:47 -0500 Received: from ptpm014.olympus.net ([198.133.237.44] helo=2thman) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1) id 107E6h-0006PA-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:49:20 -0800 From: "Barrett/Burns" <2thman@olympus.net> To: Subject: Hysol again Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:51:38 -0800 Message-ID: <01be4db7$b382cbc0$LocalHost@2thman> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I know I should just shut up, but can't resist making another stab at what seems logical to me about this issue. First to answer the e-mail from Ed Sikora, the Hysol that Lancair sells is Hysol 9339. I don't know about the 9430 formula. You might want to find out what its properties are in relationship to the 9339 before using it for structural bonds. In defense of my less stringent measuring method using a small gram scale I offer the following. For the most accurate results, one should use an electronic scale set to zero with a container on it. Measure out the base desired and use the ratio to compute the amount of hardener required. Use another container to measure the proper amount of hardener, zeroing the scale with the container first. Then try to mix the two together presumably transferring the hardener in to the other conatiner, but make sure you leave no molecules in the hardener container, or your ratio will be off. Another choice is to do step one above, then add the appropriate amount of hardener to the base, but what if you add just one gram too much - or even one tenth of a gram. Doesn't that throw off your ratio as well? When using syringes, it seems impossible to me to get ratios as accurate as called for. I use syringes all the time in my dental profession, and there is no way on earth that we could control dispensed quantities that closely. To set the record straight, I do make the calculations for structural batches of Hysol, but then when I measure quantities, I acknowledge the reality of the practical impediments to accuracy. It seems that this is an example of "measuring with a micrometer - then cutting with a chain saw" that we get caught up with sometimes in the homebuilt business. By all means, every builder should do every step as accurately as possible and use his best judgment to ensure that his aircraft will perform to his (or her) expectations. I have performed shear tests on junctions between aluminum hinge material and carbon fiber layups where the surface of the joint was approx. 1" X 1.5". Some test pieces were joined with Hysol and some with epoxy/flox. The Hysol was mixed with ratios that were only guessed at - not even measured. The epoxy/flox joints broke at about 100 to 200 pounds while the Hysol joints held to 700 pounds. The purpose of the tests was to measure the strength of our graphite hinges, but the results were enlightening concerning the Hysol. John Barrett