Return-Path: Received: from camel8.mindspring.com ([207.69.200.58]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:29:43 -0500 Received: from Desktop (user-37ka9fl.dialup.mindspring.com [207.69.37.245]) by camel8.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA10806 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:31:12 -0500 (EST) From: danobrien@mindspring.com Message-ID: <001301be4b37$a13a7580$f52545cf@Desktop.ftc.gov> To: Subject: ES H. Stab Incidence Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:29:49 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Wow! It was not my intention to set off fireworks when I posted the "error" in the ES manual regarding the H. Stab incidence. Just to keep the record straight, I posted the issue because it seemed important, even if the only implication is the potential for running out of nose-up trim in slow flight. It was characterized to me as an "error," not as a matter of "preference," though as others point out planes with the "error" apparently fly great. Saying I was "surprised" was not intended to be incendiary, only to alert other builders to check, double-check, and ask questions about important steps in the process of building an "experimental" airplane. And I want to echo the comments of Robert Stia that the Lancair people offer great support. They have been more than helpful to me every time I've turned to them. I'm glad I bought my Lancair kit, and I'd do it over again. But I hope we all keep posting such information, because improving our building experience and the flying qualities of our planes is what this forum is all about. And more ES posts! There aren't enough of them.