Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:38:53 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.8.50.190] (HELO mta6.adelphia.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP id 1970211 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:34:11 -0500 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by mta6.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.25 201-253-122-126-125-20021216) with SMTP id <20030110153410.DRBC25561.mta6.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:34:10 -0500 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: ES angle of incidence X-Original-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:30:54 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Speaking of tweaking the angle after the main spar bolts are in, the ES I have came with the "mating option" and the main spar bolt holes were already there. When I measured the incidence they were 2 degrees different. When fitting the front spar attach I could tweak the angles only to 0.5 degrees different, but this means that the main spar bolts are now cocked in the holes as far as the clearance will allow. Incidentally (pardon the pun) the wings also had a twist that was different by about 0.5 degrees. Should I be worried about this? Gary Casey