Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:51:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.34] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP id 1945311 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 22:46:52 -0500 Received: from b8p5r1 (slip-12-65-222-186.mis.prserv.net[12.65.222.186]) by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP id <2003010503464720405bf83fe>; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 03:46:48 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "Lancair List" Subject: FW: LNC2 Squat Switch X-Original-Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:47:49 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c2b46d$38eebc40$bade410c@b8p5r1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Angier and I had the following discussion off list. For those of you who haven't heard my agony here's one way to loose a year and a half of good flying. This story is about my IO360 LNC2 which had 11 months and about 110 hours on it at the time. =20 This one you won't find under an NTSB report. Two lines of demarcation regarding NTSB reporting according to AOPA and EAA at the time were: 1) Was there damage to the airfield? =20 2) Was there a 911 or EMS called? =20 In my case the answers were both no (my airport manager thought the little tick marks in the runway to be irrelevant). Safe flying! =20 Larry > "Along these lines it'd be great to have a SB informing folks to > calibrate their "safety" squat switch. Mine went down the runway set=20 > at > > 68 kts. Darn." >=20 >Hi Larry, > > Did this result in any damage?? Hope not. > Is this switch adjustable and if so, what airspeed did you use? > Larry Henney wrote: > Yes Angier, > > My builder, pilot, and mechanic (me, me, and me again) all helped out > in sending my father, my son, and I to the runway in a foolish hurry=20 > with the gear handle up. The switch actuated just as advertised in=20 > the Lancair catalog (or a kt or two slow, I forget). I think it was=20 > originally designed for 235 speeds and gross weights. Anyway, the=20 > gear retracted just prior to rotation at full power and max gross=20 > weight (perhaps an 80-85 kt liftoff speed). > > $30K later, I rebuilt it firewall fwd, gear doors, center belly > section. Much angst and humiliation. > > Don't make my mistake of not checking the set point if you have one. > I now have it set at about 1.3 Vs or 90 kts. I think I could squeak=20 > it back to 85 without much fear. Much lower would increase the risk=20 > dramatically. OUCH! I know this is a really stupid question but, ....why was the gear handle up prior to rotation? Angier, The longer version goes like this. Father, Son(builder, mechanic, and pilot), and grandson showed up to go fly and found a dead battery. The builder failed to make convenient access to his battery for charging. The battery is located on the firewall. The cowling has piano hinges. Thus, actually starting the plane cowl off is a bad idea for cowl reinstall while engine running (and subsequent charging). Mechanic (smart guy) jumps in here and suggests that there are heavy gauge wires in the passenger seat back providing power to the hydraulic power unit. These feed the battery and could conveniently be used for charging the plane. And so it goes. Open seat back, connect battery charger. Begin charging. Clickety, clickety, clack. For some reason the hyd unit was cycling on and off with power on the charger. At one point I had a more direct reason for the clickety clack. I'm a little unsure, but perhaps it was the need for more down pressure amidst the need for amps to drive the motor. A little pressure bleed down after the plane sits for awhile is normal. The pump will momentarily chirp recharging the system following turn on of the master. Pilot (smarter guy) jumps in here and suggests, "well for maintenance you can take the hyd unit control power off line by raising the gear handle". Why, you ask? Because we're not moving and the pitot safety squatch switch requires 70 kts (actually 68) to operate the gear. So, the 3 of them (builder, pilot, and mechanic) decide it'll be an easy fast way to charge the battery. Vroom. The plane is started (long after the preflight checklist was completed-remember check gear handle down). The pilot jumps in while father returns charger (3 yr old son already installed in jump seat) and pilot holds brakes while replacing screws in seat back access panel. (pilot a little not thinking of flying toy airplane at this point). (Did I mention, pilot needs to catch two jumpseats to get from Fresno to Miami later in the day while on probation with brand new airline job? ... And skipped church to boot..Never a good idea.) A short while later following a takeoff checklist father, son, and grandson are standing beside the rubble and notice the plane sitting a bit lower than usual. Switch had worked admirably at 68 kts allowing the nose to retract first. Then following the addition of about 5 more kts the plane while airborne retracted much of the main gear before grinding it's way back onto the runway. Twelve dents in the runway were hardly noticable while the prop tip was virtually folded under after the subsequent flare (and prang). =20 The rebuilder (smartest guy yet) has now installed a lovely little Cessna charging receptacle in the passenger seat back (properly bypassing the hyd unit). Additionally, he adjusted the pitot switch to 90 kts (still a bit higher perhaps than necessary). Finally, added about 30 pounds of glass, foam, and micro to further reduce climb rate and top speed by a quarter kt. Rebuilder immediately went on a 30 pound diet to compensate for these performance deficiencies. Never in the history of the world had I raised (or even considered raising) a gear handle on the ground. I bought the switch based on the once in a million chance that one of my 4 devious little rug rats might inadvertantly raise the handle. Never had it occurred to me that pitot static switch was adjustable or possibly set too low. It became a mechanics tool which somehow left the pilot without any cognitive involvement. Happy to be here alive to tell you about it. Morals of the story. =20 =20 1. Don=92t be in a rush. =20 2. Have as many people look over your plane as possible (before and after 1st flight-mine had over 100 hours on it with this squat bomb waiting to say hello) 3. Have folks quiz you about possible failure modes and ramifications prior to strapping it on.=20 4. Finally, if the unusual (maintenance) ever occurs after any checklist has begun (flight attendant interuptions for example), have the pilot return to the first checklist and do it over before moving forward. My saga; hope yours isn't this enriching nor humbling. Larry Henney N360LH 325 hrs (think how fast it'd be w/o the rebuild) :(