Return-Path: Received: from imo29.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.73]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:09:12 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo29.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id 7CYa001222 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:09:10 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <9c89a24a.36afff06@aol.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:09:10 EST To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Lancair Factory Support X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 1/27/99 9:47:44 PM, you wrote: <> I have to second this sentiment. I have found several areas where the manual cound be improved, and a couple of cases where I had the wrong part, and once when I had a defective part. However, in all cases the factory provided clarifying information, sent me the proper part, or exchanged the defective part. I have gotten outstanding support to this day, despite the fact that I paid them in 1994 for the kit. And all of their help has been for free. Sure, we'd all like it if each and every problem that a builder has found would be instantly transmitted to the rest of us. But that's what this forum is for. (Thanks, Marv!) I suppose if I were one of those guys at Lancair that spent hours on the phone answering the same question day in and day out -- maybe I'd drop a line on the topic to this forum or to Lynda Frantz's publication to diminish the phone calls. But then, Lancair is a small company that's very busy doing great things, like updating the spam can factory offerings by about 40 years. Maybe they could do even better, but I've certainly gotten my money's worth. - Rob Wolf rwolf99@aol.com