Return-Path: Received: from baron.nii.net ([209.113.172.16]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:30:25 -0500 Received: from nii.net (xcom9.nii.net [209.113.173.73]) by baron.nii.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA28495; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:31:44 -0500 Message-ID: <3691894B.E97D3BED@nii.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 23:38:52 -0400 From: "Angier M. Ames" Organization: Alpha Delta Research To: "C.L.Keller" CC: Lancair Subject: Re: LC20 Figure 14-17 Rev 4/10-15-97 References: <36910837.74E9@burgoyne.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi Charles, You do not have the most current figure 14-17. This having been said, the contents of figure 14-17 Rev 4/10-15-97 are accurate. I did not realize that it makes no difference which relay terminal is IN or OUT! Angier Ames C.L.Keller wrote: > > Angier: > You said the figure was on 14-36. My manual, which I received only a > few months ago, does have this figure 14-17 on page 14-36, but it is > rev. 3/12-1-95. Since I had to call Linda Neibauerg for other purposes, > I asked about this revision. There was a lot of confusion about whether > my manual has rev.4 (it does have some pages with that rev.) and whether > rev.4 includes this page. > Now I'm curious - are the figures (page, figure, rev.) you quoted > correct? Incidentally, the schematic looks OK in my book. > Charles Keller