Return-Path: Received: from fep03-svc.tin.it (mta03-acc.tin.it [212.216.176.34]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 00:04:24 -0500 Received: from tin.it ([212.216.215.200]) by fep03-svc.tin.it (InterMail v4.0 201-221-105) with ESMTP id <19990105050541.KTL26314.fep03-svc@tin.it> for ; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 06:05:41 +0100 Message-ID: <3690500B.CD705D47@tin.it> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 06:22:20 +0100 From: John F: Herminghaus Reply-To: catignano@tin.it To: Lancairlist Subject: Reflex X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> The discussion on wing reflexing is very interesting. I'm only missing one thing: a definition of what it is. Can someone help? John Herminghaus catignano@tin.it {Reflexing is the deflection of the control surface in the negative direction, thereby reducing lift slightly which is accompanied by an attendant reduction in drag. The flaps on the LC20, for example, when in their fully retracted position, are actually reflexed (moved upward from the 'faired in' position) approximately 3 degrees. The current discussion is focused on the drag reduction which might be acquired by reflexing the ailerons, a configuration not supported by the present control system. I hope this helps. As I am still intent on installing a console mounted center control stick on my LC20 it would be a relatively simple matter to design aileron reflex into the new control system. If the concensus of the aero engrg types currently active with the LML (and Martin Hollmann's opinion) support this modification I will plan on incorporating it when the time comes. I will probably come up with a way to interlink it with the flap control so the reflex would be removed in the lower speed regimes when increased lift is the primary goal. ]