Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 22:52:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d08.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1722603 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 20:56:02 -0400 Received: from PJHWFD@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id q.89.1d682b2c (3996) for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:56:00 -0400 (EDT) From: PJHWFD@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <89.1d682b2c.2aa95720@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:56:00 EDT Subject: L2K glare shield Fitting X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_89.1d682b2c.2aa95720_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10577 --part1_89.1d682b2c.2aa95720_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sometimes the easy things are hard and viseversa. Does anyone have insight into fitting the glare shield as well as most of the other Legacy parts do. I am not happy with it's present fit and wonder if cutting it or maybe camlocs would improve things. Also does any one have areplacement for the special bonding epoxy used for static wicks to get conductivety. Peter Hebert Legacy #163 --part1_89.1d682b2c.2aa95720_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sometimes the easy things are hard and viseversa. Does anyone have insight into fitting the glare shield as well as most of the other Legacy parts do. I am not happy with it's present fit and wonder if cutting it or maybe camlocs would improve things. Also does any one have areplacement for the special bonding epoxy used for static wicks to get conductivety.
Peter Hebert Legacy #163 --part1_89.1d682b2c.2aa95720_boundary--