Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:03:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1711413 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 10:41:54 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H1EM5U00.N00 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 10:41:54 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: inlet air temperature monitor X-Original-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 07:40:37 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> I would say that the inlet air temperature is a valid piece of information to have - how useful could be questioned. A temperature too high would invite detonation and higher temperatures reduce power output so it is actually this temperature rather than ambient that should be used to determine the "density altitude" of the engine. Trouble is there is no real data available to use in this calculation and I've not heard of a upper temperature limit published by Continental. Therefore you would have to establish your own limits. I plan to have this information available, but I admit I'm not sure what I will do with it. Gary Casey ES, turbo