Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:28:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [196.37.249.19] (HELO cyberpro.co.za) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1515705 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 02:26:03 -0400 Received: from pine by cyberpro.co.za with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:28:08 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <001301c21e08$868aa500$36871ac4@pine> Reply-To: "AP Pienaar" From: "AP Pienaar" X-Original-To: "LancairList" Subject: Lancair Support X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:29:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Lookup-Warning: reverse lookup on original sender failed X-Return-Path: pine@cpro.co.za X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: lml@lancaironline.net Hi Is it only me or does every body wait a week or two or longer to get questions answered. I asked then what tolerance on the thickness of the elevator from side to side is acceptable. My one is 0.3 " thicker on the one side. The fact that it's the MK I worries me. It seem that the support is now focused on the Legacy !!! Does this mean that the moulds for the 320 will be neglected, and should we be VERY WORRIED!!??? Pine Pienaar pine@cpro.co.za Lancair 360 #664