Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:46:13 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1514859@logan.com>
Pgp-Action: PGP/MIME-signclear; rfc822=off;
 originator="Paul Davis <pdavis@pdavis.bmc.com>"
From: "Paul Davis" <pdavis@bmc.com>
Reply-to: "Paul Davis" <pdavis@bmc.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: stalls/spins 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:29:45 EDT."
             <list-1514343@logan.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


>>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, "Bill" == Bill & Sue wrote:

  +> How many of those who continue to minimize the importance of AOA
  +> indicators and stall avoidance and maximize the importance of
  +> stall training have actually read the article?

  Bill> Woa Paul,

  Bill> I haven't heard ANYBODY, either pro or anti-stall training,
  Bill> minimize the importance of AOA indicators and stall
  Bill> avoidance. Have you?

Woa Bill,

I said "minimize", not "trivialize".
As written, I only compared relative importance.  It is possible to 
minimize A and maximize B while holding A as important -- just not as 
important as B.  And yes, that's exactly what I've heard.

-------------------
Paul Davis
Lancair Legacy builder
pdavis@bmc.com
Phone 713-918-1550
-------------------
Difficile est tenere quae acceperis nisi exerceas
It is difficult to retain what you may have learned unless you should practice it