Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:02:07 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1502606@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <wdodson@bak.rr.com>
Received: from orngca-mls03.socal.rr.com ([66.75.160.18] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4)
  with ESMTP id 1502433 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:11:23 -0400
Received: from walter (bak-24-161-199-34.bak.rr.com [24.161.199.34])
	by orngca-mls03.socal.rr.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.3) with SMTP id g5L5BLL25328
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <005c01c218e2$668409c0$22c7a118@bak.rr.com>
From: "Walter Dodson" <wdodson@bak.rr.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: IV-P door seal facing strip
X-Original-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:13:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

This is a question for those of you who are flying your IV-P's with
pressurization operative.  The factory construction manual I have says to
install the fuselage side door seal, p/n SF14-1704.
It is called a modification and there are instructions to cut down an
earlier type seal to yeild the proper flange width.  I believe I have that
later type seal.  Reference figs 28:K:1, 2 & 3 in chap. 28 and the
instruction paragraphs.
Neither Hal Woodruff or I can remember seeing a seal on the fuselage of any
IV-P we have looked at.  Are we blind?  Is this seal not currently used?  Is
it better to leave it off?
Any and all comments are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Walter Dodson    IV-P  86% and progressing...