Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with ESMTP id 1027485 for rob@logan.com; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:41:05 -0500 Received: from lsmls01.we.mediaone.net ([24.130.1.20]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:30:34 -0500 Received: from mediaone.net (we-24-127-94-60.we.mediaone.net [24.127.94.60]) by lsmls01.we.mediaone.net (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0IHUgH13835 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:30:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C485BA4.4D3E2DD4@mediaone.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:30:12 -0800 From: freemen@mediaone.net MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lancair Mail List List Subject: Re: What if? References: <3C46ED05.97095869@lvcm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Rick Schrameck wrote ":.....an additional 100 to 150 HP" More horsepower is always better. I am suspicious as to what the trade off is? Lower TBO time? How about if I was able to sell a "part" that would allow you to burn 87 octane fuel in place of 100LL with no detonation problems? I am privy to some new technology that has been many years in development. Through many hours of testing, I have seen a 11:1 compression engine running on low octane (87 unleaded cut 25% with diesel fuel) running at high horsepower with no detonation. Anyone interested? Brent S. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>