Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5) with ESMTP id 970663 for rob@logan.com; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:03:26 -0500 Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net ([64.164.98.8]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:48:00 -0500 Received: from postoffice.pacbell.net ([32.102.123.85]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GOA000TWK0Q2M@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:48:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:40:56 -0800 From: erosiak@postoffice.pacbell.net Subject: Re: Insurance To: "lancair.list@olsusa.com" Reply-to: erosiak@pacbell.net Reply-to: lancair.list@olsusa.com Message-id: <3C18DA18.A7A87341@postoffice.pacbell.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <003301c183aa$ed484520$6601a8c0@hawaii.rr.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> IIP wrote: > I wonder if there's a whole different way to go with this. What if the > Association was self-insured? Brian, Aren't you describing an Insurance Company here? I for one would not want to be associated in scheme such as this, because the lawyers would try to include everyone they could in a suit. Maybe one member doesn't have deep pockets, but add in 100 and it starts looking good to any lawyer who sees his 33% of the take as a better possibility. Ed Rosiak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>