Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b9) with ESMTP id 968690 for rob@logan.com; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:56:05 -0500 Received: from smtp.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.3]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:55:01 -0500 Received: from ws-01.olsusa.com ([207.30.195.186]) by smtp.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:54:35 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011210105418.01da8ae0@pop3.olsusa.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:54:54 -0500 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Marvin Kaye Subject: Re: Lancair Association - Insurance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Posted for JOSCALES@aol.com: The association idea seems to me to be a good one. I responded early to the proposal but now have a couple of more questions. Here's what I think I am hearing: Aircraft inspections, initial and recurrent training, open to all pilots and all models of Lancair aircraft (including certified models?). Here is my current status: Aircraft was inspected numerous times while under construction by EAA Tech Advisor. Was inspected for airworthiness by DAR. Was pre-testflight inspected by Charlie Kohler. Was test flown by Charlie Kohler. I was transitioned into the plane by Charlie, also. Was able to have first flight coverage insurance by having Charlie listed as an approved pilot. I now have 1100 hours PIC with 260 hours of that total in the Lancair. I happily fly it in IFR conditions when I need to, practice approaches and maneuvers monthly, fly with a CFII annually and have full coverage insurance at what I consider a reasonable premium. Here are the questions: What would be suggested to me to improve my situation? What kind of inspections would be required, who would do them, where would they take place? Would the inpections that have already been done be satisfy? Who would provide the recurrent training and where would that be done? What kind of documentation would be furnished and who would be responsible for its accuracy and authenticity when questioned by the insurance companies? Would the discounted insurance rates only be available from one company or is there thought that more than one company would be involved? I have followed this string with interest, curiosity, at times amusement, and, on a couple of occasions, amazement. I appreciate the efforts of the ones who are taking the project forward. I really see nothing but good things that can come out of it. I also believe that if someone doesn't want to participate then that person doesn't have to. It doesn't appear that not participating will produce a penalty, it is just seems that participating may produce a benefit. That's my $.02. Jim Scales 98AF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>