Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:57:32 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6496908@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.219.44; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com
References: <list-6496360@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-6496360@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Why ipad is nice

I would be extremely nervous in St Elmo's fire while flying one of our plast=
ic toys.  I remember having a ball of that stuff one night back in the 60's b=
ouncing on the long pointed nose of the F9 I was flying and watching it fly u=
p over my head across the bubble canopy.  That was fun then but the amount o=
f static electricity involved could be disastrous in a composite aircraft as=
 I understand it.  Hopefully you were flying a metal airplane then?

John

Sent from my iPad


On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Todd Long <toddlong1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Otis real time connected to wifi. The searching is the 4g. Doesn't work so=
 well at Fl410. Yes I agree penetrating with adsb is a disaster waiting to h=
appen. But great for avoidance. As you can see for planning with only the ra=
dar it looks like we could cut back west after the storm by our TOD. Not see=
ing the N-S line of storms behind it. We offset by 50nm and still got an ama=
zing st Elmo's fire on the front window. Dry ice crystals really charged us u=
p.=20
>=20
> Typing and grammar errors courtesy of Siri and the iPhone.
>=20
>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 7:57, John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Revealing photo, Todd.
>>=20
>> Not sure but does the iPad have a signal to generate the radar pictureat t=
he time ofmthismphot?  Or do I see a "searching" message in the upper left o=
f the screen that would be telling you the information is not current but wa=
s picked up at the last time you had the Foreflight on and were getting a si=
gnal?  Keep in mind the NEXRAD info is already history when you get it from a=
 fresh signal.
>>=20
>> John Barrett
>>=20
>> Sent from my iPad
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Sep 29, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Todd Long <toddlong1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Here is a comparison showing how much more info is shown on foreflight o=
n the iPad vs onboard radar. The onboard can't see thru the storm to show wh=
at is on the other side. Which is a big nasty storm.=20
>>>=20
>>> <photo.JPG>
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Typing and grammar errors courtesy of Siri and the iPhone.
>>> --
>>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.h=
tml
>>=20
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht=
ml
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm=
l