X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:59:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-m09.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6495828 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:55:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.143.82; envelope-from=n5276j@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.200]) by omr-m09.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 6ABA2700000BA for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mlb003b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mlb003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.186.145]) by mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 09331E000082 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:55:11 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: steve X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D08BF36E9B5467_11A4_94886_Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38079-STANDARD Received: from 70.193.197.113 by Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com (205.188.171.204) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:55:10 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D08BF36E9B5467-11A4-2CD1C@Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [70.193.197.113] X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:55:10 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c8524974af28fa This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D08BF36E9B5467_11A4_94886_Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Chris, I'm going to re-just my flaps to -10 reflex and see what happens. = What would you guess the measurement is up from the trailing edge of the fa= ired in position? Thanks for all your work. Do you need a small tail 360 for more= testing? Steve Alderman N25SA -----Original Message----- From: Chris Zavatson To: lml Sent: Sun, Sep 29, 2013 8:54 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability So I happened to be looking for something unrelated in the FB manual and ca= me across this on page 10-24: =20 "Lancair flaps are full electric actuated. They are designed to run from += 45 down to -10 up (reflex). Note that the 'faired in position' for flaps i= s actually a -7 deg reflex position. ....." =20 My standard build manual is in storage so I could not compare. It would ap= pear the intent was to be able to go to -10 degrees after all. =20 Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std http://www.n91cz.net/ =20 =20 =20 =20 From: Christian Meier To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability =20 =20 Chris, today I made a picture during Cruise with Autopilot at 7500ft with followin= g configuration: 770 kg 40l in header, 20l in each wing (80l total), 75kg and 83kg for pilo= t and co. Flap was on 7=C2=B0 reflex CG 26,20" =20 My design CG is 22,8 - 30,3 from firewall back, horizontal was installed= - 0.6=C2=B0 So it looks like if I would add more reflex than 7=C2=B0, I would need more= down elevator. So the gain with the higher reflex would be lost with the down elevator.... Christian =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ----------MB_8D08BF36E9B5467_11A4_94886_Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Chris,   I'm going to re-just my flaps to -10 reflex and see= what happens. What would you guess the measurement is up from the trailing= edge of the faired in position?
            Tha= nks for all your work. Do you need a small tail 360 for more testing?
 
Steve Alderman   N25SA
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Zavatson <chris_zavatson@yahoo.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, Sep 29, 2013 8:54 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability

So I happened to be looking for something unrelated in the FB manual a= nd came across this on page 10-24:
 
"Lancair flaps are full electric actuated.  They are designed to = run from +45 down to -10 up (reflex).  Note that the 'faired in positi= on' for flaps is actually a -7 deg reflex position. ....."
 
My standard build manual is in storage so I could not compare.  I= t would appear the intent was to be able to go to -10 degrees after all.
 
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std

=20
= =20
=20
=20
Fr= om: Christian Meier <lanc= air@meier.cc>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, September = 24, 2013 3:19 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancai= r 320/360 performance and stability
=20

Chris,

today I made a picture during Cruise with Autopilot at 7500ft with fol= lowing configuration:
770 kg  40l in header, 20l in each wing (80l total), 75kg and 83kg for pilot and co.
Flap was on 7=C2=B0 reflex  CG 26,20"  
My design CG is 22,8  -  30,3 from firewall back,  hori= zontal was installed - 0.6=C2=B0

So it looks like if I would add more reflex than 7=C2=B0, I would need= more down elevator.
So the gain with the higher reflex would be lost with the down elevato= r....

Christian
 

 
=20
= =20
=20
 
 
 
 
 



----------MB_8D08BF36E9B5467_11A4_94886_Webmail-d110.sysops.aol.com--