X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:08:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6490019 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:06:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.174; envelope-from=joeczabaranek@gmail.com Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uz6so51031obc.19 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:05:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.133.71 with SMTP id pa7mr7920276oeb.44.1380132339702; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:05:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [10.176.92.30] (82.sub-70-196-67.myvzw.com. [70.196.67.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm41551652oeu.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Suitable Hydraulic Fluid in Parker 108 Hydraulic Pack References: From: Joseph Czabaranek Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-DF22DDF7-EC68-4B13-BD82-D9405D7798E5 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <589713E6-5776-49B8-974B-BFC2CB509ACA@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:05:36 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-DF22DDF7-EC68-4B13-BD82-D9405D7798E5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The Parker manual doesn't specify 5606, that's why I ask. The manual specifi= es "ATF, OD18, or other clean hydraulic oil with a viscosity of 150-300 SUS a= t 38C", if another type is used "consult the factory" The label on Phillips 5606 states that it is not to be used on natural rubbe= r. And the MIL-SPEC viscosity is outside of the Parker manual's recommendati= on. Two votes for 5606 from the List so far. Anyone have experience with anothe= r fluid? Joe Czabaranek On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Robert R Pastusek wrote: > Joe wrote: > =20 > I have a can of Phillips 66 X/C Aviation Hydraulic Fluid that Id like to u= se in my Parker 108 series hydraulic pack. MIL-PRF-5606F states that viscos= ity should be ~15cSt at 38C. The Parker/Olidyne spec is ~35-65cSt. So the= Phillips fluid is less viscous and is labeled not for use with natural rubb= er components. =20 > =20 > Does anyone know if this fluid is suitable? > =20 > Can someone recommend an inexpensive, automotive fluid that has proven eff= ective? > =20 > Much appreciated > =20 > Joe Czabaranek > 424DH > =20 > Joe, > While 5606 hydraulic oil is a bit pricey, you only need a little, and it=E2= =80=99s not like engine oil that you need to change periodically=E2=80=A6alt= hough they do recommend flushing/replacing every ten years=E2=80=A6 Why take= a chance with the seals, etc. It will cost you a LOT more time and aggravat= ion to repair/correct the damage caused by non-compatible fluids than just u= sing the specified 5606. > =20 > My two cents=E2=80=A6 >=20 > Bob --Apple-Mail-DF22DDF7-EC68-4B13-BD82-D9405D7798E5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The Parker manual doesn't specify 5606= , that's why I ask. The manual specifies "ATF, OD18, or other clean hydrauli= c oil with a viscosity of 150-300 SUS at 38C", if another type is used "cons= ult the factory"

The label on Phillips 5606 states t= hat it is not to be used on natural rubber. And the MIL-SPEC viscosity is ou= tside of the Parker manual's recommendation.

Two vo= tes for 5606 from the List so far.  Anyone have experience with another= fluid?

Joe Czabaranek

On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:25= PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@h= tii.com> wrote:

=

Joe wrote:

 

I have a can of Phillips 66 X/C Aviation Hydraulic Fl= uid that Id like to use in my Parker 108 series hydraulic pack.  MIL-PR= F-5606F states that viscosity should be ~15cSt at 38C.   The Parker/Oli= dyne spec is ~35-65cSt.  So the Phillips fluid is less viscous and is labeled not for use with natural rubber compon= ents.  

 

Does anyone know if this fluid is suitable?

 

Can someone recommend an inexpensive, automotive flui= d that has proven effective?

 

Much appreciated

 

Joe Czabaranek

424DH

 

Joe,

While 5606 hydraulic oil is a bit pricey, you only nee= d a little, and it=E2=80=99s not like engine oil that you need to change periodically=E2=80=A6although they do recommend flushing/replacing every te= n years=E2=80=A6 Why take a chance with the seals, etc. It will cost you a L= OT more time and aggravation to repair/correct the damage caused by non-comp= atible fluids than just using the specified 5606.

 

My two cents=E2=80=A6


Bob

= --Apple-Mail-DF22DDF7-EC68-4B13-BD82-D9405D7798E5--