X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:54:47 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6476347 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:00:38 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.24; envelope-from=jmorgan1023@comcast.net Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RYvK1m0021YDfWL51Z031X; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:00:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([24.11.157.196]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RZ021m00r4EXR5U3gZ03z8; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:00:03 +0000 From: Jack Morgan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3467B91C-1C5D-4B4F-BEE7-F4F74B3A4FA2" Subject: Inspections and repairman certs X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:00:01 -0400 References: <895A91EE-01CA-4E1D-8B22-56837F57036D@comcast.net> X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) --Apple-Mail=_3467B91C-1C5D-4B4F-BEE7-F4F74B3A4FA2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Jack Morgan > Subject: Re: lml Digest #4319 > Date: September 15, 2013 9:05:34 AM EDT > To: "Lancair Mailing List" >=20 > Hi Angier and Charlie >=20 > The FAA inspector that certified mine issued my repairman certificate = with just one more form when he signed off the Certification for first = flight. At that time all he needed for the repairman certificate was = proof that I built it which was satisfied automatically by the = inspection. Guess he was satisfied I built it based on our conversations = during his inspection as he didn't request any photos, etc. The = repairman certificate came in the mail after a few weeks. I can't help = with the requirements for the repairman certificate If a DAR did the = original aircraft certification. In any case, not being able use this = particular inspector any longer due to government BS is a loss to our = local homebuilder community. >=20 > Jack Morgan >=20 > On Sep 15, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote: >=20 >> From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd." >> Subject: Re: Certification >> Date: September 14, 2013 8:25:27 AM EDT >> To: Lancair Mailing List >>=20 >>=20 >> Hi Jack, >>=20 >> My plane is beyond certification. The local FSDO issues Repairman = Certificates and they'll issue a temporary >> when I see them on Tuesday. >>=20 >> Angier Ames >> N4ZQ >=20 --Apple-Mail=_3467B91C-1C5D-4B4F-BEE7-F4F74B3A4FA2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Jack Morgan <jmorgan1023@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: lml Digest #4319
Date: September 15, 2013 = 9:05:34 AM EDT
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>

Hi Angier and = Charlie

The FAA inspector that certified mine issued = my repairman certificate with just one more form when he signed off the = Certification for first flight. At that time all he needed for the = repairman certificate was proof that I built it which was satisfied = automatically by the inspection. Guess he was satisfied I built it based = on our conversations during his inspection as he didn't request any = photos, etc. The repairman certificate came in the mail after a few = weeks. I can't help with the requirements for the repairman certificate = If a DAR did the original aircraft certification. In any case, not being = able use this particular inspector any longer due to government BS is a = loss to our local homebuilder community.

Jack = Morgan

On Sep 15, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Lancair = Mailing List wrote:

From: "Greenbacks, = UnLtd." <Subject: Re: = Certification