X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 21:36:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-m07.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6474729 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:50:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.143.81; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.134]) by omr-m07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 4460D700000B3 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.114.49.58] (mobile-166-147-096-185.mycingular.net [166.147.96.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 7173FE0000E8; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:50:23 -0400 (EDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B44DE9C4-508B-412D-B8C1-172D372FA137 X-Original-Message-Id: <8C390D5C-49EF-4B2D-9E63-48E5B41DBB47@aol.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Jeff Edwards Subject: Re: [LML] FAA certification X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:50:18 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33865233b2cf2ba4 X-AOL-IP: 166.147.96.185 --Apple-Mail-B44DE9C4-508B-412D-B8C1-172D372FA137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hard to imagine the government could grind to a halt over such a small cut i= n the spending growth. Oh well, I heard if you show your EAA card the FAA wi= ll only charge $50,000 for the inspection. After all, it is their money! On Sep 13, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: > All. >=20 > The FSDO inspector did a good job for me a couple of years ago. He did not= require any kind of inspection guide.... only the normal documentation we a= re all familiar with. I agreed with everything he found and was happy for hi= s expertise. He was contacted recently by an RV builder and he advised him h= e was no longer allowed to do inspections because of "sequester cuts". This i= nspector is a solid guy and it was obvious he was not buying the government B= S either. I suspect using a DAR now is wise as the FAA management folks are t= rying to make lives miserable fearing cuts. As usual it will vary by FSDO. >=20 > Jack Morgan >=20 > On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >>> In preparation for my meeting with the FSDO inspector next Tuesday morni= ng, could one of you possibly share >>> a checklist for 320/360 airframe, propeller and engine condition inspect= ion that would typically be used >>> as a guide for annual condition inspection? They apparently require such= a document. >>>=20 >>> Perhaps our LOBO friends have compiled such a checklist? >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>>=20 >>> Angier Ames >>> N4ZQ >>> -- >=20 --Apple-Mail-B44DE9C4-508B-412D-B8C1-172D372FA137 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hard to imagine the government could g= rind to a halt over such a small cut in the spending growth. Oh well, I hear= d if you show your EAA card the FAA will only charge $50,000 for the inspect= ion. After all, it is their money!


On Sep 1= 3, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Jack Morgan <jmorgan1023@comcast.net> wrote:

All.

The FSDO inspector did a good job for me a= couple of years ago. He did not require any kind of inspection guide.... on= ly the normal documentation we are all familiar with. I agreed with everythi= ng he found and was happy for his expertise. He was contacted recently by an= RV builder and he advised him he was no longer allowed to do inspections be= cause of "sequester cuts". This inspector is a solid guy and it was obvious h= e was not buying the government BS either. I suspect using a DAR now is wise= as the FAA management folks are trying to make lives miserable fearing cuts= . As usual it will vary by FSDO.

Jack Morgan
<= div>
On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote:<= /div>

In preparati= on for my meeting with the FSDO inspector next Tuesday morning, could one of= you possibly share
a checklist fo= r 320/360 airframe, propeller and engine condition inspection that would typ= ically be used
as a guide for annu= al condition inspection? They apparently require such a document.

P= erhaps our LOBO friends have compiled such a checklist?

Thanks,
=

Angier Ames
N4ZQ
--


= = --Apple-Mail-B44DE9C4-508B-412D-B8C1-172D372FA137--