Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:31:50 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6473720@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=17.172.108.250; envelope-from=yak55m@icloud.com
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Video Inspection Tool
References: <list-6472411@logan.com>
From: andres katz <yak55m@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <list-6472411@logan.com>
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)

And you can get your surveillance for free as an added bonus....

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Brad Simmons <dl60280@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I can vouch for the colonoscope... once you get the nerve up to actually t=
ouch it... it's better than any boroscope I have ever used!
>=20
>=20
> Brad Simmons
> Airframes Inc.
> 39 Airport Rd.
> Milan, TN  38358
> 731-686-3610
> 731-686-3613 fax
> www.airframesinc.com
>=20
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Noel" <tednoel@cfl.rr.com>
> To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 8:22 AM
> Subject: [LML] Re: Video Inspection Tool
>=20
>=20
>> These are a nice idea, but if you are interested in inspecting your fuel b=
ays, there are three problems
>> 1. too short - 4-5 feet long is needed
>> 2. cross section too large - check your fuel passages - 3/4" probably won=
't pass
>> 3. not steerable
>>=20
>> This is why I bought a used colonoscope years ago. Now there are other pr=
oducts that come closer to our needs.
>>=20
>> Ted Noel
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 9/12/2013 8:31 AM, Colyn Case wrote:
>>> Hi George,   I'm in the market too.
>>> Looking this one over, it looks nicely integrated but the resolution is n=
ot impressive.
>>> Especially when you consider stuff like this:
>>> http://www.supercircuits.com/security-cameras/micro-video-cameras/mini-c=
olor-snake-pinhole-camera-pc223xp
>>> or the higher res version of that here:
>>> http://www.supercircuits.com/security-cameras/micro-video-cameras/hi-res=
-low-light-color-snake-camera-pc229xp
>>>=20
>>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:56 AM, George Wehrung wrote:
>>>=20
>>> All,
>>>=20
>>> Once again seeking input/experience.  After reading Mike Busch's article=
 in Flying magazine regarding compression checks I am convinced that also co=
nducting a visual inspection of the cylinders is wise.  Furthermore, I like t=
he idea of recording it for year to year comparison.  I emailed Mike on his r=
ecommendation and although he recommended a local EAA chapter purchase the $=
1,000 SnapOn model to share, it will not work for me where I am at.  Plus li=
ke most of us, no-one takes care of your tools like you do.
>>>=20
>>> After visiting a few of the typical online aviation shops I am consideri=
ng the ATS model as it seems to be adapted for aviation use rather than a ru=
n of the mill automobile:
>>>=20
>>> http://www.aircraft-tool.com/shop/detail.aspx?PRODUCT_ID=3DATS-VS400-3
>>>=20
>>> Does anyone have experience with using these?  Also trying to decide 1 o=
r 3 meter length.  The one meter would be easier for the engine inspection b=
ut the three meter has possibility for running under floor boards, behind th=
e instrument panel or maybe in the tail.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks
>>>=20
>>> George
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.h=
tml
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.h=
tml
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3222/6659 - Release Date: 09/12/1=
3
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht=
ml
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm=
l