Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.61; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=RhKDfdTi4T7J8wR/6NAL84cZ8hbd81k5wiFT19qTsJGhskFl9TF0dwnX1g+suL88;
  h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [LML] Video Inspection Tool
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-6471755@logan.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:31:45 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <90DF866B-A47F-4F4E-A1D3-25E2A4618D74@earthlink.net>
References: <list-6471755@logan.com>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>

Hi George,   I'm in the market too.  =20
Looking this one over, it looks nicely integrated but the resolution is =
not impressive.
Especially when you consider stuff like this:
=
http://www.supercircuits.com/security-cameras/micro-video-cameras/mini-col=
or-snake-pinhole-camera-pc223xp
or the higher res version of that here:
=
http://www.supercircuits.com/security-cameras/micro-video-cameras/hi-res-l=
ow-light-color-snake-camera-pc229xp

On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:56 AM, George Wehrung wrote:

All,

Once again seeking input/experience.  After reading Mike Busch's article =
in Flying magazine regarding compression checks I am convinced that also =
conducting a visual inspection of the cylinders is wise.  Furthermore, I =
like the idea of recording it for year to year comparison.  I emailed =
Mike on his recommendation and although he recommended a local EAA =
chapter purchase the $1,000 SnapOn model to share, it will not work for =
me where I am at.  Plus like most of us, no-one takes care of your tools =
like you do. =20

After visiting a few of the typical online aviation shops I am =
considering the ATS model as it seems to be adapted for aviation use =
rather than a run of the mill automobile:

http://www.aircraft-tool.com/shop/detail.aspx?PRODUCT_ID=3DATS-VS400-3

Does anyone have experience with using these?  Also trying to decide 1 =
or 3 meter length.  The one meter would be easier for the engine =
inspection but the three meter has possibility for running under floor =
boards, behind the instrument panel or maybe in the tail.

Thanks

George


--
For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html