X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 01:56:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nk11p08mm-asmtp001.mac.com ([17.158.58.246] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.6) with ESMTP id 6461553 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:42:00 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=17.158.58.246; envelope-from=gw5@me.com Received: from [10.55.209.231] ([216.147.135.217]) by nk11p08mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.07(7.0.4.27.6) 64bit (built Jun 21 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MSW00IY1R4N5EB0@nk11p08mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:41:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-09-10_04:2013-09-10,2013-09-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=2 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1309100044 From: George Wehrung Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Video Inspection Tool X-Original-Message-id: <161F6754-FF9D-4AAA-8677-E6E818965779@me.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:11:10 +0430 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) All, Once again seeking input/experience. After reading Mike Busch's article = in Flying magazine regarding compression checks I am convinced that also = conducting a visual inspection of the cylinders is wise. Furthermore, I = like the idea of recording it for year to year comparison. I emailed = Mike on his recommendation and although he recommended a local EAA = chapter purchase the $1,000 SnapOn model to share, it will not work for = me where I am at. Plus like most of us, no-one takes care of your tools = like you do. =20 After visiting a few of the typical online aviation shops I am = considering the ATS model as it seems to be adapted for aviation use = rather than a run of the mill automobile: http://www.aircraft-tool.com/shop/detail.aspx?PRODUCT_ID=3DATS-VS400-3 Does anyone have experience with using these? Also trying to decide 1 = or 3 meter length. The one meter would be easier for the engine = inspection but the three meter has possibility for running under floor = boards, behind the instrument panel or maybe in the tail. Thanks George