X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:30:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.201] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4) with ESMTP id 6226546 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:32:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.109.201; envelope-from=n5276j@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.202]) by omr-d04.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 6F0D17001ED8E for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mlc004a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mlc004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.188.210]) by mtaomg-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 41EDCE000086 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:45 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Range In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: steve X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D0103D2FD8FAC3_2084_52C3F_webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37655-STANDARD Received: from 70.193.198.166 by webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com (64.12.183.157) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:44 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D0103D2FCAB27D-2084-15C16@webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [70.193.198.166] X-Original-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:44 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:430947072:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33ca5179e6d566e1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D0103D2FD8FAC3_2084_52C3F_webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Wow, TMI to each his own. Lets go the other way, who has been aloft in a 3= 60-320 the longest, with out extra tanks( non built in) wing and header onl= y. I've done 9:20 min.=20 25SA -----Original Message----- From: Sky2high To: lml Sent: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 5:35 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Range Immediate adsorption - no problem. But, do not close the zip before withd= rawal - especially in turbulence. =20 In a message dated 4/25/2013 5:46:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time, N4ZQ@VERIZ= ON.NET writes: Just guessing, but perhaps a Zip Loc could become a serious hazard in t= urbulence.... N4ZQ -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml ----------MB_8D0103D2FD8FAC3_2084_52C3F_webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Wow,  TMI to each his own. Lets go the other way, who has been al= oft in a 360-320 the longest, with out extra tanks( non built in) wing and = header only. I've done 9:20 min.
 
25SA
-----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high <Sky2high@aol.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 5:35 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Range

Immediate adsorption  - no problem.  But, do not close = the=20 zip before withdrawal - especially in turbulence.
 
In a message dated 4/25/2013 5:46:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET writes:
= Just=20 guessing, but perhaps a Zip Loc could become a serious hazard in=20 turbulence....

N4ZQ


--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
=
----------MB_8D0103D2FD8FAC3_2084_52C3F_webmail-m172.sysops.aol.com--