X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:08:50 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTP id 5592766 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:11:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.39; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.74]) by imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5BEAeCL003858 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:10:41 -0400 Received: from core-mtc002b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mtc002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.235.5]) by mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id B122EE000092 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:10:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <21a54.2ff00064.3d07565f@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:10:39 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [LML] VM1000 Fuel Flow Transducer X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_21a54.2ff00064.3d07565f_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [67.175.156.123] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:451220448:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294a4fd5fc606ac7 --part1_21a54.2ff00064.3d07565f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill, Did you change anything just before the flow indication went wonky? Moved the sensor, changed its hookup, etc.? Scott Krueger In a message dated 6/11/2012 8:12:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time, billhogarty@gmail.com writes: Does anyone have a VM 1000 fuel flow transducer that they arnt using at the present time? Mine is giving me strange readings and after running the Transducer Test, I dont know where else to look.. I had the DPU checked out and upgraded. The fuel pressure was out of tolerance but the offset was constant, so its usable at least for the present. If I had my druthers, I would like to borrow a transducer, if possible, just to check against mine. I understand that the original unit is a flowscan 201B and the VNS # is 3010032 or maybe 3010035. Any help would be appreciated. Bill Hogarty -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_21a54.2ff00064.3d07565f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill,

Did you change anything just before the flow indication went wonky?&nb= sp;=20 Moved the sensor, changed its hookup, etc.?

Scott Krueger

In a message dated 6/11/2012 8:12:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 billhogarty@gmail.com writes:

= Does=20 anyone have a VM 1000 fuel flow transducer that they arnt using
at the= =20 present time?

Mine is giving me strange readings and after running= the=20 Transducer
Test, I dont know where else to look..

I had the DPU= =20 checked out and upgraded. The fuel pressure was out of
tolerance= but=20 the offset was constant,
so its usable at least for the present.
If=20 I had my druthers, I would like to borrow a transducer, if
possible, j= ust=20 to check against mine. I understand that
the original unit is a= =20 flowscan 201B and the VNS # is 3010032 or maybe 3010035.

Any= help=20 would be appreciated.

Bill Hogarty

--
For archives and u= nsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--part1_21a54.2ff00064.3d07565f_boundary--