X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:37:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5135648 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:08:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.17; envelope-from=danny.miller@verizon.net Received: from DannyLaptop ([unknown] [71.114.20.24]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LS2007GIV1G0SG5@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:08:06 -0500 (CDT) From: "Danny Miller" X-Original-To: "'William A. Hogarty'" , References: In-reply-to: Subject: RE: IPAD Program X-Original-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:08:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-id: <002e01cc7b7b$c5baf6a0$5130e3e0$@miller@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01CC7B5A.3EA956A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Acx7HzbF22tldQuPTGKEdHhEYgA6zAAW9TxA Content-language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CC7B5A.3EA956A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=92ve been using Foreflight for several months now and I love it. = I=92ve heard/read numerous reviews of both. There are some obvious differences with pros and cons for both but the bottom line is that it seems = Foreflight is the product of choice if you prefer IFR while WingX is better for = VFR. But, I haven=92t used WingX so I can=92t verify. =20 Danny Miller N 38=B0 43' 25.7" W 77=B0 30' 38.6" =20 From: William A. Hogarty [mailto:billhogarty@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 9:05 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: IPAD Program =20 Gang: Finally got my hands on an IPAD. Can anyone give me a recommendation between Foreflight and the WingsX program. Thanks, Bill Hogarty ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CC7B5A.3EA956A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I’ve been using = Foreflight for several months now and I love it.=A0 I’ve = heard/read numerous reviews of both.=A0 There are some obvious = differences with pros and cons for both but the bottom line is that it = seems Foreflight is the product of choice if you prefer IFR while WingX = is better for VFR.=A0 But, I haven’t used WingX so I can’t = verify.

 <= /p>

Danny = Miller

N 38=B0 43' = 25.7"

W 77=B0 30' = 38.6"

 <= /p>

From: William A. = Hogarty [mailto:billhogarty@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 = 9:05 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: IPAD = Program

 

Gang:

Finally got my hands on an = IPAD.  Can anyone give me a recommendation between Foreflight and = the WingsX program.

Thanks, Bill = Hogarty

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01CC7B5A.3EA956A0--