X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:41:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wolverine.webiness.com ([65.61.103.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTPS id 5095586 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:43:31 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.61.103.66; envelope-from=brent@regandesigns.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=regandesigns.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=KWpS/OgN8vJK756CgNjvuA7UAJkgALJ+u3+MwvSFuGK30I01HkIzDu6bOAMLZk1alJnGGo4W3+Qnm0iH6KP694nUhroJg1XwWj8f8vEMOgHPoKNsecAMyrUEA7MCWH6F; Received: from 207-170-226-178.static.twtelecom.net ([207.170.226.178] helo=[192.168.1.101]) by wolverine.webiness.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QtqgG-0002SB-0e for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:41:56 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <4E4C6007.4000006@regandesigns.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:42:47 -0700 From: Brent Regan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: Re-doing my panel - carefully thinking through failures Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000006070600040907090007" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wolverine.webiness.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - regandesigns.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000006070600040907090007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill's recalcitrance to admit the truth is faltering' <<<<>> FAR 23.1303 specifies that an Airspeed Indicator is a required flight instrument. Bill, for the elucidation of everyone, please be kind enough to tell us where "Airspeed Indicator" is defined by the FAA so we all know exactly what it meant by that term. Of course we know from your prior statements that "TSO-C2d, Airspeed Instruments" and the referenced "SAE Aerospace Standard 8019 "Airspeed Instrument"" is absolutely NOT where we would find any information regarding the aforementioned device. Regards Brent Regan --------------000006070600040907090007 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill's recalcitrance to admit the truth is faltering' <<<<<Only the Altimeter installed must meet TSO according to the regulations.>>>

FAR 23.1303 specifies that an Airspeed Indicator is a required flight instrument.

Bill, for the elucidation of everyone, please be kind enough to tell us where "Airspeed Indicator" is defined by the FAA so we all know exactly what it meant by that term.

Of course we know from your prior statements that "TSO-C2d, Airspeed Instruments" and the referenced "SAE Aerospace Standard 8019 "Airspeed Instrument"" is absolutely NOT where we would find any information regarding the aforementioned device.

Regards
Brent Regan
--------------000006070600040907090007--