X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:00:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s21.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5093797 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:52:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.96; envelope-from=gt_phantom@hotmail.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP250 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s21.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:52:13 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [99.101.70.201] X-Originating-Email: [gt_phantom@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gt_phantom@hotmail.com Received: from [192.168.1.70] ([99.101.70.201]) by BLU0-SMTP250.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:52:13 -0700 X-Original-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:52:12 -0400 From: GT Phantom Reply-To: gt_phantom@hotmail.com Organization: None User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110419 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Re-doing my panel - carefully thinking through failures References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2011 13:52:13.0202 (UTC) FILETIME=[B37BF720:01CC5C1B] Brent,

I'm sorry it pains you so to consider you may be misinformed that you resort to insulting language, but the facts are the facts.  Only the Altimeter installed must meet TSO according to the regulations.  Other instruments installed in an Experimental aircraft are not subject to that rule, and no other rule requires it.  By installing a non-TSO instrument in the aircraft the builder is "personally certifying" that the instrument is suitable to flight for the regimes of flight for which it will be used.

Casting insults does not change the regs; it only highlights that some people unfortunately react immaturely when faced with the possibility that what they think they know is incorrect.

Fly Safe!

Bill



On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Brent Regan wrote:
A TSO is a TSO is a TSO.

Bill writes:

<<< It is not true that every other piece of equipment in an experimental aircraft must meet TSO.>>>

What I  wrote was " You MUST have at least one of each of the required instruments and they MUST meet the TSO, regardless of whether the manufacturer has TSO Authorization or the altimeter has TSO Design Approval."

Bills confusion is not uncommon.