X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:23:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.64.152.110] (HELO sdc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5092535 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:14:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.64.152.110; envelope-from=ronald@sdc.com Received: from [192.168.1.104] [68.202.60.124] by sdc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-11.5) id 03d200017e990665; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:03:02 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:14:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [LML] Performance Engines From: RONALD STEVENS X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [LML] Performance Engines In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I had a performance engine.........STAY AWAY, and I do not care if they would sue me or not, but STAY AWAY, worst ever customer service ever I have seen by a company in the USA. Also, my engine had many issues, broken parts, 2 nuts broken off from the cylinder in flight (and this was on a velocity, so the nuts came through the MT propeller destroying it. Many times I tried calling them, or emailing them........they just never answer or call back. It is unbelievable that they are still in business, but apparently they still find new victims. So that was my rant LOL and my personal opinion, freedom of speech blabla LOL == Ronald On 8/15/11 7:39 AM, "Bob Rickard" wrote: >Gang > >Has anyone had experience with Performance Engines in Laverne, CA? If >so, good or bad reviews? If bad, who do you guys like out there for a >TSIO -550 in a IV-P? I have a quote from TCM for a stock engine, just >exploring options. I recall some bad stories last year but don't >remember the shop names. > >Thanks > >Bob R > > > > > >-- >For archives and unsub >http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html