X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:27:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.243] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5091120 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:14:34 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.27.243; envelope-from=olsen25@comcast.net Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KuB51h0041eYJf8ADuDxT3; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:13:57 +0000 Received: from SibranPC ([98.245.158.191]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KuEk1h00n483eG201uEkYX; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:14:45 +0000 From: "Dan & Kari Olsen" X-Original-To: Subject: Carbon vs. e-glass cowl for IV-P X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:13:33 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <003901cc59e4$b6e3f4f0$24abded0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003A_01CC59B2.6C4984F0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AcxZ5IJAu9I8r5rhSz+sL6cc7/dgMA== Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CC59B2.6C4984F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, I'm early in the stages of building my IV-P (piston) kit and am looking for advice on whether I should use the standard e-glass cowl that came with the kit (circa 1997) or if I should pay to upgrade to the carbon cowl. I know there will be some weight savings. Do any of you know how much? Are there any other differences or advantages for the carbon version? Dan ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CC59B2.6C4984F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings,

I’m = early in the stages of building my IV-P (piston) kit and am looking for = advice on whether I should use the standard e-glass cowl that came with = the kit (circa 1997) or if I should pay to upgrade to the carbon = cowl. I know there will be some weight savings. Do any of = you know how much? Are there any other differences or advantages = for the carbon version?

Dan

------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CC59B2.6C4984F0--