Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:57:15 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5087859@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=fb/UEzxQyyt1QLioO5w2KR1igo+YeTBrQajLf1L509pzYPOE/IpAXAJmj9Eo1R1t;
  h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [LML] EFIS versus six pack
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-5087780@logan.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <list-5087780@logan.com>

michael,   got a link to that report?

On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Michael Smith wrote:

> All these discussions about panel upgrades and so on begs the question =
as to
> which setup- a an EFIS and flat screen set up or standard spinning =
gyros
> works better in terms of delivering an intact crew and passenger to =
the
> terminal and a plane that is reusable for further flight. I clearly =
agree
> the panels look cool, but I do pay attention to peer reviewed science. =
 The=20
>=20
> Cirrus folks did a study and the results published about a year ago
> comparing the conventional gyro panels and the EFIS in the same model =
of
> plane- as close a randomized controlled trial in aviation as possible =
these
> days. =20
>=20
> The EFIS cohort bent more planes and orphaned more kids than the old =
school
> gyros.=20
>=20
> So I won't be flying with an EFIS until someone can prove they're =
safer.
>=20
> Michael Smith
> LIV now over 1000TT
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html