X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:13:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.100.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5086774 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:39:08 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.100.31; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p79DcPx5019473 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:38:25 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.11b3.4448b89 (55831) for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.169]) by cia-md05.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD058-b23f4e4138491ac; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:38:20 -0400 Received: from webmail-m003 (webmail-m003.sim.aol.com [64.12.101.86]) by smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE028-b23f4e4138491ac; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:38:17 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Oshkosh Parking question X-Original-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:38:17 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 75.49.225.118 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE24B0BB30686C_F14_87953_webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 34007-STANDARD Received: from 75.49.225.118 by webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.86) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:38:17 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CE24B0BB1FBEC5-F14-39958@webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CE24B0BB30686C_F14_87953_webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" yes... -----Original Message----- From: don Grabiel To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 8:40 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Oshkosh Parking question I also was parked there. That would be good for next year too. Yes I vote= to request it for next year. Don G 722B On Aug 7, 2011 7:15 PM, "Steve Colwell" wrote: > This year most of the IV's and ES were parked behind Van's booth on both > sides of the paved taxiway. I think it was to make room for the Zenair's= in > our usual parking area to have a special event for the designer .=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The question is, do enough of us want to request parking off that paved > taxiway next year? One big advantage is ease of movement if the ground= is > soft. We would also have to get them to push us back a little further fr= om > the taxiway for wing clearance. What do you think?=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Steve Colwell Legacy >=20 ----------MB_8CE24B0BB30686C_F14_87953_webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" yes...



-----Original Message-----
From: don Grabiel <grabiel71@gmail.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 8:40 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Oshkosh Parking question

I also was parked there. That would be good for next year too. Yes I= vote to request it for next year.  Don G 722B
On Aug 7, 2011 7:15 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919@yahoo.com> wrote:> This year most of the IV's and ES were parked= behind Van's booth on both
> sides of the paved taxiway. I think it was to make room for the Zenai= r's in
> our usual parking area to have a special event for the designer . >
>
>
> The question is, do enough of us want to request parking off that pav= ed
> taxiway next year? One big advantage is ease of movement if the groun= d is
> soft. We would also have to get them to push us back a little further= from
> the taxiway for wing clearance. What do you think?
>
>
>
> Steve Colwell Legacy
>
----------MB_8CE24B0BB30686C_F14_87953_webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com--