X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:55:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5086203 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:32:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.61; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=XNmIFLwpzJbK9byOZiUJbJzQRJ/JjWwDmt1fTvJDGJkzoy3V0ID/JSF3G8C+UxrL; h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [64.223.163.164] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Qqd38-0007cM-F6 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:32:14 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fw: Re: Re-doing my panel - carefully thinking through failures From: Colyn Case In-Reply-To: X-Original-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:32:13 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Message-Id: <2139DFB9-9022-4131-AC82-FB4B82563183@earthlink.net> References: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940002b4230ca58e681fbc41d8bf55c4fe7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.223.163.164 Hamid, that is very helpful. I can see lots of ways that the e bus would lose = power. The particular scenario I was worried about was an event on the A bus = reaching the B bus. This would require probably that both diodes that = feed the e bus fail closed with little or no reverse current protection = remaining on the B leg. Colyn On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Hamid Wasti wrote: > Colyn Case wrote: >> At the risk of topic drift.....I put in those big fat diodes to my = essential bus also. >> Since them I'm wondering if there's a failure mode on one bus that = crosses the diodes and takes out the other bus. > A diode can fail open, shorted or "out of spec" meaning that one or = more parameters (voltage drop, reverse current, series resistance etc) = is very high. According to various documents on Failure Mode = Distribution, about 50% of the failure modes in power diodes result in a = shorted diode, about 30% in open diode and about 20% in out of spec = failure. Different sources use different numbers and they vary for = different components, but that is a ball park to get a sense of things. >=20 > A shorted diode is basically a direct connection, tying the two busses = together and essentially making them one. An open diode prevents power = from going through the diode to the destination buss, leaving it = permanently isolated from one of its sources. Parameter change is an = unsustainable state. It may allow the diode to function briefly, but = with use under load, it will invariably fail either open or shorted. >=20 > Diodes can fail for many reasons, among them: Over-heating, = Over-voltage, Over-current. If you have under-sized the diode or not = properly heat sunk it, it will die after some time in "normal" use. >=20 > Heat is generated in a diode's die and is a function of the current = and the diode's voltage drop (voltage in volts multiplied by current in = amps =3D power in watts). That heat needs to be conducted to the outside = of the case, then through some mechanical interface to the heat sink and = then to the ambient air. If the case to heat sink interface is not = properly designed and properly implemented, the die can be considerably = hotter than the heat sink. If the heat sink is not receiving cooling = air, it can be considerably hotter than the ambient air around it. If = the air is circulating in a closed environment it may be a lot warmer = than the outside. If the air happens to be low on air molecules (flying = at FL280) it may not be taking away as much heat as you had tested at = sea level. All of this can conspire to over-heat the die and lead to = failure. >=20 > Surely the easiest thing in the world is to make sure that you use a = diode with a higher current rating than the highest possible current in = your system. Right? Actually, no! The important part is to use the = correct current rating, which is not always obvious. The headline = current rating is valid at a certain temperature, which is often (but = not always) 25C die temperature. In real life, the die is going to be a = lot warmer than that, maybe as much as 100C warmer. Buried in the = datasheet is a graph indicating the maximum current at higher = temperatures, or a footnote along the lines of "Maximum current = decreases by .....A per degree C for higher temperatures" To know if = the diode is going to work for you, you need to figure out the maximum = power dissipation, figure out the temperature increase due to that much = power, add that to the maximum heat sink temperature and then make sure = that it can handle the current at that die temperature. The resulting = current limit is invariably going to be a lot lower than the headline = number and if you are exceeding that, your diode is under-sized. >=20 > If you have battery disconnection on one buss, the alternator can = generate a voltage spike of several 10's of volts. DO-160 calls for 28V = certified systems to be able to survive up to a 100mS wide 80V spike, = followed by 48V for 1 second. If there is an 80V spike on the A Buss, = while the B Buss stays at 28V, the diode between the essential buss and = the B Buss will see a voltage of close to 50V. Is it rated for that? If = you B Buss happens to be off due to a failure, the diode is going to see = almost the full 80V. Will it survive that? If it fails shorted, you just = lost your essential buss. Unlike over-current, there is no transient = specification for over-voltage. Even a momentary over-voltage can damage = a diode. >=20 > Turning off switches and hot-unplugging a high current load can cause = a flyback voltage due to the inductance of the power wire. Unless this = is anticipated and protected against, it can kill an isolation diode. An = intermittent power connection in a tray is the same as repeatedly = hot-plugging/hot-unplugging. >=20 > Finally, a word about the worst kind of failure: The out-of-spec = failure. Lets say due to one of the aforementioned events, you have an = out-of-spec failure where the diode's internal resistance increases an = order of magnitude or more from the original value of a few mili-ohms. = Lets say you have a system where the "A Buss" and "B Buss" feed an = essential buss and the diode on the A Buss side has failed with high = resistance. If you do a system check at every startup where you = sequentially shut down both busses and make sure that the essential buss = can run from the remaining one, you are likely to find that the = essential buss works. The failed diode will be able to operate the load = for a little bit while it over-heats. During normal operation, the diode = on the A Buss will take all the load. But if you have a failure of the A = Buss and all the current starts going through this high resistance = diode, it is quickly going to fail and as Murphy's Law states, there is = 100% likelihood that this will be one of the 30% of times where it fails = open. >=20 > I am sure I can think of a few more scenarios where a failure can go = undetected by typical checks. The bottom line is that unless you are = willing and able to get into it a lot deeper, a "simple and reliable" = system may only be half so. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Hamid >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html