X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:51:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4164533 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:18:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.68.8.170; envelope-from=dreagan@fuse.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=X1rELT0kDvWo85A5FDKnG0uHmFNi2icXqw7zXdXZ5dE= c=1 sm=0 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=vOQuoQC0ptIIgCdv_BcA:9 a=KgXiG8v6DZcLLXeK3Cy23jb6g14A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=5OvznGSPezwCBs95:21 a=rOyBHKX-zrCMsSX3:21 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=EFnwz-AFuWfwecGj4bQA:9 a=OaTv6KCK2f6VdWwbXr8A:7 a=lTs6pUMdrVoOWv6povo_jcijrQEA:4 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=toHbME6XnZE_7jau:21 a=qBZbEhJKfcDPn0xV:21 a=YSInfqOFtCJHyb2O6gqBBw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=dreagan@fuse.net; spf=unknown Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.42.126 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of fuse.net Received: from [208.102.42.126] ([208.102.42.126:50150] helo=D45LWMF1) by ecout1 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTP id 43/87-17418-ABCAB9B4; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:18:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <005001cac2c0$677f0f10$fdc8a8c0@D45LWMF1> From: "Dan Reagan" X-Original-To: References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Tires for a 360 X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:18:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004D_01CAC296.7E9AAF30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CAC296.7E9AAF30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not that it is a good comparison but I got 305 on the mains on my IVP. = This is with good alignment. =20 Dan Reagan ----- Original Message -----=20 From: farnsworth=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 7:55 PM Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Tires for a 360 =20 =20 I realize the subject is 360 tires and I have a Legacy. I notice = people are saying their tires are lasting XXX number of hours. I would = think a better measure would be the number of landings a person gets on = a given tire. I got 195 landings on my last main gear tire. =20 Lynn Farnsworth ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CAC296.7E9AAF30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not that it is a good comparison but I = got 305 on=20 the mains on my IVP.  This is with good alignment.  =
 
Dan Reagan
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 farnsworth
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 = 7:55=20 PM
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Tires = for a=20 360

 

 

I realize the subject is 360 tires and I = have a=20 Legacy. I notice people are saying their tires are lasting XXX number = of=20 hours. I would think a better measure would be the number of landings = a person=20 gets on a given tire. I got 195 landings on my last main gear=20 tire.

 

Lynn=20 = Farnsworth

------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CAC296.7E9AAF30--